They've made good cosmetic changes to the UI, cleaned up the apps etc.įeatures to features comparison of Inoreader versus Feedly are like Apples to Oranges- although, I am definitely stoked by the AI engine and the ML feature. However, I don't have any beef with them because it's a solid service for me. Inoreader needs to be smart about its communication Teams option is expensive. The UI is better for Inoreader, though, it is my personal observation. Feedly is NOT transparent about the future pricing (that's likely to be around $12 per month and I think you are overpaying for your subscription.
Mind you, that's only for the first year. That's the reason why I am so hesitant to plonk USD 99 for Pro+. They are extremely well informed and actually go out to help an end-user. Inoreader tops it out with stellar customer support.
Quiterss number filter trial#
So which one should you buy? I will try to reach out to Feedly to give me a trial subscription. Highlights Feature showcases specific keywords so that you scan through RSS river Rules, Filters, Regular Expressions can really make Inoreader powerful. I think this is the killer feature.įeedly doesn't offer this option, at all. Generate RSS feeds for websites that don't offer them. The AI looks very promising I am curious about the article summaries and the highlights within the articles. No WordPress integration- though you can possibly do it through IFTTT.
Couldn't find a trial account to try it out. Requires active search for specific topics that you wish to followīetter keyboard integration. Use the advanced search on Twitter to show tweets with links, for example).Īlmost the same feature. USD 99 per year (for Pro+) (1st year and then USD 144 subsequently)
0 kommentar(er)
